Industrial Communications and Electronics, Inc. et al v. Town of Alton
| Industrial Communications and Electronics, Inc., RCC Atlantic, Inc. and U.S.C.O.C of New Hampshire RSA #2, Inc. |
| Alton, Town of |
| Marilyn Slade and David Slade |
| 1:2007cv00082 |
| March 23, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 332 Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
PERMANENT INJUNCTION. The Town of Alton and its elected officials, officers, and agents shall forthwith take all necessary steps to effectuate theissuance of all variances, permits, and other approvals necessaryfor the construction and operation of the 100-foot wireless towerat 486 East Side Drive, Alton, New Hampshire, shown in the plansapproved by the Alton Planning Board on February 15, 2011. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(dae)
|
|
Filing
129
///FINDINGS OF FACT, RULINGS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT. The court enters judgment for the plaintiffs on their effective prohibition claim (count 2 of their complaint). The plaintiffs' substantial evidence claim (count 1 of their complaint) is dismissed as moot. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Hearing re Notice of Hearing. Summary judgment hearing set for September 21, 2011 at 10:00 am. The Slades to file brief as outlined on or before September 9, 2011. ICE may file response on or before September 16, 2011 (no reply or surreply shall be permitted). So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 78 Motion to Stay of Order. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
76
///ORDER re 66 Agreement for Entry of Judgment with Proposed Order. For the foregoing reasons, the clerk shall enter judgment in the form of the proposed Judgment and Order submitted by the Town and the provider, except that t he following language shall be added to the end of subparagraph 6(d): "Nothing in this order shall prevent this court from staying or otherwise granting relief from it according to applicable law." So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER re 71 Notice of Intent to File a Reply to Plaintiff's and Defendant's Memorandums of Law Regarding Scope of Intervenors' Rights. Parties to notify Deputy Clerk as to whether they wish oral argument or if any reason court should not actively consider this issue. Intervenors' reply due no later than April 6th, and surreplies no later than April 9th. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER re 66 Agreement for Entry of Judgment with Proposed Order. Intervenors memorandum regarding continued standing due on or before March 16, 2010. Response, if any, due March 23, 2010. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
