Brodeur et al v. Claremont School District et al
| Elaine Brodeur and William Brodeur |
| Claremont School District, Gene Grumman and Leo Paul Couture |
| 1:2007cv00206 |
| July 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Sullivan |
| James R. Muirhead |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Grumman's Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 19 Claremont School District's Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment Granted as to Counts 2-3 and 6-11 and are Denied as to Counts 1, 4-5 and 12; also denied without prejudice insofar as they challenge the plaintiffs' remaining damages claims. Grumman is terminated as a defendant in this matter. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (dae)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER re 6/5/09 motion hearing. Order to issue in the next week or so on motions for summary judgment. By agreement of the parties, Nicole Brodeur will be added to the caption as plaintiff. The parties may address two legal issues (as outlined in attached order) raised by the court at oral argument. New deadline for pretrial statements and motions in limine is June 15. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
