Philbrick et al v. eNom, Incorporated
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 22, 2009
///ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by eNom, Inc.; denying 51 Motion for Summary Judgment on ACPA Claim (Count I) filed by Dover Sports, Inc., Daniel J. Philbrick; denying as moot 26 Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant from Offering Evidence of Plaintiff's Political Activities; denying as moot 27 Motion to Take Judicial Notice of WIPO and NAF Decisions; denying as moot 28 Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant from Offering Evidence of O ther Trademarks; denying as moot 32 Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Requests; denying as moot 36 Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence of UDRP Proceedings; denying as moot 37 Motion in Limine to Exclude Unauthen ticated Screenshots; denying as moot 38 Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Offering Evidence of Unrelated Domain Names and Websites; denying as moot 39 Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Presenting Evidence or Arguement Relati ng to the Accessibility of Third-Party Archival Websites; denying as moot 75 Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 4 and 5 to eNom's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 85 Motion to Strike and Exclude Certain Evidence Submitted by Plaintiffs in Opposition to eNoms Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 90 Motion to Strike 77 Memorandum to Motion and/or Objection; denying 95 Motion for Sanctions Due to Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence and Altern ative Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude Defendant from Contesting the Authenticity of Screenshots Taken from the Infringing Websites. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/23/2009: # 1 January 22, 2009 Order) (cmp).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?