Clearview Software International, Inc. et al v. Ware
Plaintiff: Clearview Software International, Inc. and Blue Ivy Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Christopher E. Ware
Case Number: 1:2007cv00405
Filed: December 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: James R. Muirhead
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ///ORDER granting 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying as moot in part 47 Motion to Strike and 55 Motion to Strike 52 Objection to Motion. Ware's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. His motions to strike certain summary judgment exhibits are GRANTED in part to the extent reflected in this order and otherwise DENIED as moot. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER approving 32 Discovery Plan (with changes). Length of Trial 8 days. Case Track: Standard. Trial will be set for March 2011. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 11/15/2010. (cmp)
September 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 PROCEDURAL ORDER re: Pretrial Conference scheduled for September 30, 2009. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
July 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ///ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Christopher Ware. The case will temporarily remain open. The plaintiffs are granted leave to August 13, 2009 to amend their complaint. Ware need not move to dismiss or answer i f a second amended complaint is filed until ordered to do so. The court will review the second amended complaint sua sponte to determine whether it satisfies Rules 8 and 9(b). A hearing will be held only if requested by Ware. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
September 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted 60 days to conduct limited discovery re issue of personal jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to schedule a show-cause hearing 60 days from the issuance of this order. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clearview Software International, Inc. et al v. Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clearview Software International, Inc.
Represented By: Paul R. Kfoury, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blue Ivy Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Paul R. Kfoury, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher E. Ware
Represented By: Jonathan M. Shirley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?