Plaintiff sued Bob Woodward and Ann Coulter for political corruption. He alleged that Bob Woodward was sleeping with First Lady Laura Bush and that Ann Coulter was sleeping with President George W. Bush to obtain and share White House secrets, so that defendants can write about them in their books. Plaintiff claims to have learned about this conspiracy in a poker game with various former politicians who are now incarcerated. Plaintiff also alleges that Ann Coulter plans to write a book titled "How to Sleep with a War Criminal." Plaintiff moves to stop any future books defendants write so that Sandy Berger at the National Archives can examine for leaked information.
Jonathan Lee Riches |
Bob Woodward and Ann Coulter |
1:2007fp00329 |
October 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
XX US, Outside State |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
2
ORDER - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or a motion to proceed IFP must be submitted within 60 days. If IFP status sought the court needs: IFP motion, financial declaration and certificate of custodial institution. Signed by Deputy Clerk Janice E. Boucher.Notice of Compliance Deadline set for 12/11/2007. (jeb)
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against Bob Woodward, Ann Coulter filed by Jonathan Lee Riches.(jeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.