Stonyfield Farm, Inc. v. Agro-Farma, Inc.
| Stonyfield Farm, Inc. |
| Agro-Farma, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00488 |
| November 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Belknap |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
307
ORDER. The court commends the parties and counsel on their efforts in reaching a non-trial resolution of this case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (kad)
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER approving 219 STIPULATION re: Erik Drake; terminating as moot 142 Motion to Exclude Testimony and Expert Opinions of Erik Drake under Daubert; terminating as moot 143 Motion to Exclude Testimony and Expert Opinions of Erik Drake under Rule 37. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
224
ORDER denying 220 Motion to Extend Time to Object/Respond. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (lt)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER denying 136 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Robert L. Bradley, Jr. Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting 94 Motion to Strike parts of the plaintiff's 86 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (gla)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 53 Motion to Amend 38 Amended Complaint; denying 54 Motion to Amend 49 Reply to Counterclaim ; granting 56 Motion to Amend Third Amended Counterclaims. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Joseph N. Laplante recused - appearance of Arnold Rosenblatt who is on my recusal list. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (dae)
|
|
Filing
40
///ORDER granting 25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Stonyfield and Schreiber's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Counts 4 (misappropriation of ideas), 5 (unfair competition), 6 (unjust enrichment), and 7 (constructive trust) of Agro-Farma's counterclaims is GRANTED. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER approving 12 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 5 days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 11/2/2009. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 5/1/2009. Mediation Follow Up on 4/15/2009. (dae)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER re preliminary pretrial conference scheduled for February 18, 2009 at 2 PM. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (dae)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stonyfield Farm, Inc. v. Agro-Farma, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stonyfield Farm, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter S. Cowan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Agro-Farma, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
