State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Broan-Nutone Manufacturing

Defendant: Broan-Nutone Manufacturing
Plaintiff: State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2008cv00497
Filed: December 2, 2008
Court: New Hampshire District Court
Office: Concord Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Joseph N. Laplante
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 20, 2009 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re: Pretrial Conference set for January 26, 2009 at 2:00pm. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Broan-Nutone Manufacturing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broan-Nutone Manufacturing
Represented By: Karyn P. Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Christie Burnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.