Northeast Credit Union v. CUNA Mutual Insurance Society
Northeast Credit Union |
CUNA Mutual Insurance Society |
1:2009cv00088 |
March 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Insurance Office |
Rockingham |
James R. Muirhead |
None |
Diversity |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgment |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge has an account with Northeast Credit Union. Judge Joseph N. Laplante recused Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (dae) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Northeast Credit Union v. CUNA Mutual Insurance Society | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Northeast Credit Union | |
Represented By: | Russell F. Hilliard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CUNA Mutual Insurance Society | |
Represented By: | Derek D. Lick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.