v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center et al
| Cross Country Trav Corp. Inc. and CHG Medical Staffing, Inc. |
| Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center |
| 1:2009cv00160 |
| May 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Belknap |
| Joseph A. DiClerico |
| None |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER: In accordance with the provisions of LR 41.1, remaining pending claims are dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER: DHMC to file a motion and memo addressing the scope of the issues and evidence for trial by 5/31/2011; defendant's response due 10 days thereafter. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER : Pretrial Statements due 8/22/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/31/2011 11:00 AM; Jury Selection/Trial set for 9/13/2011 09:30 AM before Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
100
PROCEDURAL ORDER: Memorandum to be filed re scope of indemnity and contribution claims as outlined. Plaintiff's Memoranda due 5/5/2011. Follow up on Defendant's Response on 5/16/2011. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER Final Pretrial Conference reset for 5/25/2011 11:00 AM (from 5/9/2011) before Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr., Jury Selection/Trial reset for two week period beginning 6/7/2011 09:30 AM (from 5/17/2011) before Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr., Pretrial Statements due 5/5/2011, Motions re: scope of issues and evidence for trial due by 5/5/2011, Response deadline set for 5/16/2011. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (ko)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER denying 88 Motion for Leave to File amended answer. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER denying 80 Motion to Compel. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (lt)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER denying 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (lt)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Compel. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (lt)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 60 Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 56 Motion for Reconsideration. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (lt)
|
|
Filing
55
///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. Indemnification and breach of contract claims against CHG shall be submitted for binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Subcontract. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (lt)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Strike Rejoinder; reply due 12/11/09. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re: 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. Set Hearing as to 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Count I - Indemnification: ( Motion Hearing set for 9/24/2009 01:30 PM before Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr.) Signed by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (dae)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
