Levesque v. State of New Hampshire, et al
| 1:2009cv00437 |
| January 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| James R. Muirhead |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER denying 95 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff must comply with this order as outlined within 45 days. Plaintiff's failure to comply with all future deadlines and orders, as well as the procedural obligations inherent in prosecuting this case, may result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference, currently set for July 13, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., will be continued. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk's Office is directed to complete summons forms and issue the summons and copies of the documents as outlined to the U.S. Marshal's Office as described in this Order. The U.S. Marshal's Office is directed to make service on Dr. John Eppolito as described in this Order. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting 59 Motion to Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status. Levesque must pay the entire filing fee within 30 days of this order. Failure to pay will result in case being dismissed without prejudice to refiling. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting Motion to Amend Complaint 30 and 31 and Directing Clerk's Office to Issue Summonses and forward to the US Marshal to Make Service on Judy Figueroa, Nancy Gallagher, Emily Wyman, Capt. Ward, andCapt. Hague at the Merrimack County House of Corrections. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
35
///ORDER approving 21 Report and Recommendations. The following cases shall be consolidated in the main case (09cv437-JL)and shall be statistically closed: Civil No. 09-cv-248-JD, Civil No. 09-cv-418-SM, Civil No. 09-cv-419-P B, Civil No. 09-cv-427-PB, Civil No. 09-cv-429-PB, Civil No. 09-cv-430-SM, Civil No. 09-cv-434-PB, Civil No. 09-cv-435-SM, Civil No. 09-cv-437-JL, Civil No. 09-cv-438-SM, Civil No. 09-cv-453-JD, Civil No. 10-cv-040-SM, Civil No. 10-cv-049-PB. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
24
AMENDED ORDER directing Clerk's Office to add further defendants, SPU and Stevenson in addition to Eppolito, Sylvester and Merrimack County House of Corrections as parties to this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER directing Clerk's Office to add defendants Eppolito, Sylvester and Merrimack County House of Corrections as parties to this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Directing US Marshal to Make Service.Certain Pleadings to be re-docketed as addenda to the complaint as outlined. As to claims against Eppolito, Sylvester and the MCHC, Clerk's Office to complete summons forms, issu e and forward to US Marshal for service. Defendants to answer within 20 days. As to claims against SPU and Steven, Clerk's Office directed to serve the NH AG as provided in Agreement on Acceptance of Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead. (cmp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Levesque v. State of New Hampshire, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
