Considine et al v. York Insurance Company of Maine et al
James R. Considine and Kathy Considine |
Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Inc. and York Insurance Company of Maine |
1:2010cv00186 |
May 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER re: Telephone Conference. The court therefore orders the parties to re-schedule their case for mediation. The court will leave to the parties the question of whether to use a federal judge or a private party to mediate. Th e parties shall notify the court on or before December 14, 2010, of its decision on that issue.Should the parties request a federal judge as mediator, the court will make that assignment and notify the parties accordingly. If the parties intend to use a private mediator, the parties shall file a written update on or before January 19, 2011, informing the court of the status of mediation. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (ko) |
Filing 12 ORDER approving with amendments 11 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 3 days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Ready for Trial on 5/17/2011. Summary Judgment Motions due by 1/18/2011. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 12/1/2010. Mediation Follow Up on 12/1/2010. (kad) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.