Lovejoy v. Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lovejoy
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank
Case Number: 1:2010cv00341
Filed: August 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the case will be dismissed without prejudice on April 8, 2011 if motion to extend time to effect service is not received by that date. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (jeb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lovejoy v. Wells Fargo Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lovejoy
Represented By: E. James Perullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?