Hudson v. Weare, Town of, et al
Cynthia Hudson |
James Carney, Wanda McLain, Weare, Town of, Gregory Begin and Daniel Aiken |
1:2011cv00090 |
March 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Joseph N. Laplante |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration re 24 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration re 24 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Filing 24 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is DENIED as to Hudson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Aiken, the Town of Weare, and the Town's police chief, but only insofar as those claims arise out of the initial traffic stop. The motion is also DENIED as to Hudson's state-law claim against Aiken for false arrest, but is GRANTED as to all other claims. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Filing 12 ORDER approving 10 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 2-3 days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 4/9/2012. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 9/1/2011. Mediation Follow Up on 11/1/2011. (dae) |
Filing 11 PROCEDURAL ORDER re Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for May 10, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.