Lemay v. NH Department of Safety, Division of State Police, Sex Offender Registry
| Harvey Lemay |
| NH Department of Safety, Division of State Police, Sex Offender Registry |
| 1:2011cv00185 |
| April 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Joseph A. DiClerico |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
///ORDER granting 33 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk to enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(lt)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 19 Motion for Funds to Hire a Stenographer. Defendants' request that Lemay's claims be dismissed is also denied. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 25 Motion to Amend 8 Amended Complaint. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access re Exhibits 4, 6, 8 and 11 filed in Support of Plaintiff's 25 Motion to Amend. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(dae)
|
|
Filing
17
///ORDER approving 9 Report and Recommendations. Case will proceed only against Troopers Rocky, McDonald and Rowe; Colonel Quinn and Troopers Elia, Fogarty and Curran are dismissed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER re service of Trooper McDonald. Clerk's office to provide Lemay with blank summons form. Miscellaneous Deadline set for 9/6/2012 to follow up return of completed summons as to Trooper McDonald. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)
|
|
Filing
6
///ORDER approving 4 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER : Lemay granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days naming defendant(s) responsible for alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Amended Pleadings due by 1/19/2012. Failure to file amendment will result in recommendation that the complaint be dismissed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER PROHIBITING REMOVE ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO Attachments to 1 Complaint.Good cause exists to prohibit a nonparty fromobtaining remote electronic access to the attachments to 1 Complaint, the clerk shall limit remote access accordingly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(2) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch. (jeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lemay v. NH Department of Safety, Division of State Police, Sex Offender Registry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NH Department of Safety, Division of State Police, Sex Offender Registry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Harvey Lemay | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
