Banks v. Hall et al
Robert Banks |
NH State Police, Gerard Ditolla, Mark Hall, Chad Lavoie, Robert Lima, Francesco Campo and Michael Cedrone |
1:2011cv00322 |
July 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Joseph N. Laplante |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER re: Jury Selection. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp) |
Filing 44 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Summary Judgment; granti ng in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. GRANTED as to Banks's claims for violation of the dog bite statute and intentional infliction of emotional distress, as well as his battery claim against Hall insofar as it arises out of his use of the police dog, but otherwise DENIED. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Filing 18 ORDER approving (with changes) 15 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 4-5 days. Case Track: Standard. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 2/1/2012.(cmp) |
Filing 17 PROCEDURAL ORDER re Pretrial Conference scheduled for October 31, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.