New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Manchester et al
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC |
Zoning Board of Adjustment, City of Manchester and City of Manchester |
1:2011cv00334 |
July 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Steven J. McAuliffe |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 ///ORDER granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 31 Defendants' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 37 Defendants' Motion to Strike the Supplemental Affidavit of Daniel L. Goulet; denying 46 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Relying on Inadmissible and Irrelevant Information in the Board Record; granting 66 Plaintiff's Assented-to Motion to Amend Complaint; and denying 70 Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Relying on Inadmissible and Irrelevant Information in the Board Record. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat) |
Filing 58 ORDER OF REMAND to the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Manchester. Parties shall report to the Court as to the Board's final decision on remand, and an updated Stipulation for the expedited resolution of the case (supplementing Stipulation (doc. no. 50) on or before October 31, 2013.( Notice of Compliance Deadline set for 10/31/2013.) So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.