Masso v. City of Manchester et al
| Katherine Ann Masso |
| Manchester School District, City of Manchester, Jason Cote and Manchester Public Television Service |
| 1:2011cv00370 |
| July 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Masso's claims against the Manchester School District are dismissed, and the School District is terminated as a party to this action. Masso's claims against the City of Manchester may proceed. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER approving 28 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 3-4 days. Case Track: Standard. Affirmative defenses stricken as outlined. City and School District to amend answers as outlined. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Summary Judgment Motions due by 8/6/2012. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 3/1/2012. Mediation Follow Up on 9/17/2012.(dae)
|
|
Filing
29
PROCEDURAL ORDER re Pretrial Conference scheduled for December 5, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. before Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
