SignalQuest, Inc. v. Chou et al
Plaintiff: SignalQuest, Inc.
Defendant: Tien-Ming Chou and Oncque Corporation
Case Number: 1:2011cv00392
Filed: August 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph N. Laplante
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MEMORANDUM ORDER: For the reasons stated, the court adopts constructions of the disputed claim terms as outlined; denying 112 Motion for Reconsideration re 111 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) Modified on 6/13/2016 to add denial of motion for reconsideration text (jb).
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER denying 86 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
February 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM ORDER: For the reasons stated, the court adopts the constructions of the disputed claim terms as outlined. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER approving as outlined 42 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 5 days. Case Track: Complex. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 5/6/2013. Joint claim construction & prehearing statement 7/26/13. Claim Construction briefs set for 9/6/2013; responsive briefs 9/20/13. Claim construction hearing (est.) 11/22/13. Fact Discovery deadline 4/21/2014. (dae)
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 32 Motion for Pre-Markman Hearing Mediation and Limited Pre-Mediation Discovery. Deadlines as outlined. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
July 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 PROCEDURAL ORDER re Pretrial Conference scheduled for July 13, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. before Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
May 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER denying 15 Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Answer Follow Up on 6/5/2012.(jb)
April 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER re 15 Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process. Parties to respond as outlined by April 13, 2012. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying 7 Motion for for Service of Process by Clerk of Court. Plaintiff's counsel may attempt to effectuate foreign service through the clerk's office without the need for judicial intervention. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SignalQuest, Inc. v. Chou et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tien-Ming Chou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oncque Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SignalQuest, Inc.
Represented By: Robert R. Lucic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?