Goldenware Travel Technologies, LLC v. Veevers-Carter
Plaintiff:
Goldenware Travel Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Rory Veevers-Carter
Case Number:
1:2011cv00505
Filed:
October 31, 2011
Court:
New Hampshire District Court
Office:
Concord Office
Presiding Judge:
Joseph N. Laplante
Nature of Suit:
Trademark
Cause of Action:
28:1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By:
Defendant
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
February 14, 2012 | 29 |
![]() |
January 24, 2012 | 27 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Goldenware Travel Technologies, LLC v. Veevers-Carter | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rory Veevers-Carter | |
Represented By: | Brandon D. Ross |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Goldenware Travel Technologies, LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael C. Harvell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.