Hanson v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Michael Hanson |
FNU Hazelton, FNU Horne, FNU Consentino, John Blomeke, FNU Trainor, Niki LNU, Spencer Mead, Prime Care Medical, Inc., Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Judy LNU and Jane Doe |
1:2011fp00534 |
December 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Paul J. Barbadoro |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 /// ORDER approving 70 Report and Recommendation, granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab) |
Filing 68 /// ORDER approving 50 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Amend and supplement the complaint. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab) |
Filing 62 ORDER extending the time for the plaintiff to file an objection or response to the 50 Report and Recommendations to October 12, 2012. (Follow up on Objections to R&R on 10/12/2012.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(jab) |
Filing 55 ORDER approving 48 Report and Recommendations; denying 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(jab) |
Filing 51 ORDER Directing US Marshal to Make Service. Clerk's Office is directed to prepare a summons for defendant Lennon and forward to U.S. Marshal's office, together with copies of the documents indicated in the order, to effect service upon defendant Lennon. Defendant Lennon is to answer within 21 days of service; Defendant Haseltine is to answer to the allegations/claims set forth in motion to amend and supplement the complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. ( Answer Follow Up on 9/25/2012.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jab) |
Filing 38 ORDER denying 36 Motion for permission to file interlocutory appeal. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lat) |
Filing 31 ORDER OF RECUSAL So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(mm) |
Filing 29 ///ORDER approving 19 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(mxm) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Extend Time to Object to 19 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting in part 22 Motion to Extend Time to Object/Respond re 19 Report and Recommendations/Order Directing Service,. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Follow up on Objection on 2/13/2012.(mm) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying without prejudice 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla) |
Filing 18 ORDER denying 4 Motion for Reconsideration. ; granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Clarify ; granting 15 Motion to Clarify ; taking under advisement 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Complaint to be served on Hazelton. Complaint to be amended as ordered. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(mm) |
Filing 12 ORDER vacating 7 Order to Transport and continuing the December 13,2011 hearing. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(mm) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Filing Fee is assessed in the amount of $39.33. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. IFP Consent Form due 1/2/2012.(amm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.