Wolfeboro, Town of v. Wright-Pierce, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wolfeboro, Town of
Defendant: Wright-Pierce, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00130
Filed: April 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph A. DiClerico
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER: The court finds and rules in favor of Wolfeboro on Count V, Wolfeboro's claim under the Consumer Protection Act, RSA chapter 358-A. The court awards actual damages in the amount of $7,658,532.42. Wolfeboro shal l notify the court as outlined on or before May 20, 2014 as to double damages. Wolfeboro shall file a properly supported motion as outlined on or before May 30, 2014 as to award of costs of the suit. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(ko)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 165 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: granting of 157 NHDES Motion to Quash. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 164 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Re: Motion to Quash Subpoena as to Dan Arsenault, EPA 162 . To the extent Wright-Pierce has any controlling law that is contrary to what the court has cited in this memorandum order, it may submit it to the court in a memorandum not to exceed seven pages. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 56 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 65 Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum; denying 69 Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum. Haley & Aldrich plan, exhibit 3 to document #54, is struck from the record and shall be removed from the docket. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla) Modified on 1/23/2014 to add: Haley text. (dae).
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to supplement (document no. 37) is granted. The plaintiff's motion to amend (document no. 28) is granted except that Count VI, Fraud, is futile as alleged, and therefore is struck from the proposed amended complaint. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(ko)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying without prejudice 23 Motion for Leave to File amended complaint. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolfeboro, Town of v. Wright-Pierce, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright-Pierce, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wolfeboro, Town of
Represented By: Rhian M.J. Cull
Represented By: Seth Michael Pasakarnis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?