Riley v. Colantuono et al
Plaintiff: Daniel John Riley
Defendant: John P. Kacavas, Thomas Colantuono and Seth R. Aframe
Case Number: 1:2012cv00175
Filed: May 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Mary M. Lisi
Presiding Judge: David L. Martin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ///ORDER approving 36 Report and Recommendation: The defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaint is GRANTED. Riley's amended complaint is dismissed in its entirety and the clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi.(ko)
October 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ERROR FILED IN WRONG CASE.ORDER: Without objection, Attorney Wiberg's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Attorney Wiberg's oral motion and RESET the plaintiffs deadline nunc pro tunc to October 31, 2012, to allow for the receipt and docketing of his objection is GRANTED. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge John H. Rich III.(ko) Modified on 10/26/2012 to add: ERROR FILED IN WRONG CASE.(ko).
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ///MEMORANDUM AND ORDER approving 10 Report and Recommendations. Counts II, V, and VI of the original complaint are DISMISSED. Riley's motion to amend his complaint is GRANTED. Riley may proceed on Counts I, II, and III of his amended complaint. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi.(ko)
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER mooting 13 Ex Parte Motion for civil summons. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Martin.(ko)
June 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Directing US Marshal to Make Service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Martin.(ko)
May 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(lml)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(lml)
May 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(lml)
May 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Steven J. McAuliffe recused. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lml)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Colantuono et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John P. Kacavas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Colantuono
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seth R. Aframe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel John Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?