USA v. Audi RS6 Sedan 2003

Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Audi RS6 Sedan 2003
Case Number: 1:2012cv00210
Filed: June 4, 2012
Court: New Hampshire District Court
Office: Concord Office
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 27, 2012 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Prohibiting Remote Electronic Access to Exhibit 6 to 9 Answer to Complaint. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(dae)
January 3, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying as moot 11 Discovery Plan. ; approving as outlined 12 Discovery Plan. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Summary Judgment Motions due by 3/25/2013. Mediation Follow Up on 6/26/2013.(dae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Audi RS6 Sedan 2003
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Robert J. Rabuck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Audi RS6 Sedan 2003
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.