Quintero v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
| George Quintero |
| Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden |
| NH Attorney General - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - HC (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2012cv00358 |
| September 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Steven J. McAuliffe |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
///ORDER granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; approving 35 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Stay( Status Report due by 9/26/2013.); denying 6 Motion to Withdraw ; approving 7 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(vln)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER directing petitioner to amend 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ( Amended Pleadings due by 3/28/2013.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(vln)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER directing Petitioner to Amend 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus., ( Amended Pleadings due by 3/4/2013.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(vln)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
