Cheney v. Harwood et al
| Michael G. Cheney |
| NH Supreme Court Attorney Discipline Board and Wade Harwood |
| NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2013cv00067 |
| February 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph A. DiClerico |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
///ORDER denying 9 Motion to Amend. Plaintiffs federal claims are dismissed for failure to state a plausible claim for relief. The court declines to exercise supplement jurisdiction as to any state law claims, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(3), which are dismissed without prejudice. Clerk to enter judgment andclose the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER re: 1 Complaint. Within 14 days, plaintiff to file motion to amend the complaint as outlined or the case will be dismissed without prejudice. Motion due by 8/1/2013. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(dae)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Financial Affidavit, Custodial Certificate, and Prisoner Consent Form filed by Michael G. Cheney, initial fee of $83.49. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.Finance Follow Up Deadline 4/22/2013(jeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
