Hilario v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Jose Miguel Hilario |
FCI Berlin, Warden, John Doe, J. Hess and USA |
1:2014fp00193 |
May 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Joseph N. Laplante |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER granting 11 Motion to Rescind as outlined, denying 22 Motion to Request that this Court Order the Defendants to Stop Giving Code Violations ; denying 24 Motion to Request Summary Judgment, at the Conclusion of this B ivens Claim Herein ; denying 32 Motion to Request that this Court Orders... [an] Answer to Plaintiffs Constitutional Questions Herein; denying without prejudice as outlined 37 Motion to Dismiss; denying 41 Motion to Request that this Court Ord er the Defendants to Give the Plaintiff Protective Custody Status. The Clerks Office is directed to correct the docket in this matter to indicate that the Oral Orders docketed on August 11, 2014, were docketed in error, and to clarifythat those Orders were in fact taken under advisement on that date.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp) |
Filing 43 ORDER approving 36 Report and Recommendation; denying 7 Motion to Order Respondent and FCI Berlin's Staff to Allow Petitioner to get Mail. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(cmp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.