Martinez v. USA et al
| Ewin Oscar Martinez |
| G. Brown, FNU Galleta, J. Hess, R. Langley, B. Santos and USA |
| 1:2014fp00231 |
| July 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER approving 61 Report and Recommendation. Defendants motion to seal (doc. no. 72) is granted. All other pending motions are terminated as moot. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER approving 23 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
|
|
Filing
11
///ORDER approving 8 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by District Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko) Modified on 9/4/2014 to add: ///(ko).
|
|
Filing
8
///REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The retaliation claims asserted against any Defendant should be dismissed from this action. Defendants Langley and Santos should be dropped from this action. Court directs service of the FTCA claims upon the United States, and the related Bivens excessive force claims against Brown, Hess, and Galleta, in their individual capacities. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(ko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
