Dionne et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
Plaintiff: Denise C. Dionne and Jason S. Dionne
Defendant: Chase and Federal National Mortgage Association
Case Number: 1:2015cv00056
Filed: February 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Landya B. McCafferty
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting 39 Motion to Exclude. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
June 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 29 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 30 Motion to Compel. The motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts VI, VII, and VIII, denied as to Counts I, III, IV, and V, and granted in part and denied in part as to Count II. The Dionnes may refile motions to compel, bearing in mind that material related to Counts VI, VII, and VIII is no longer relevant to this case. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss; granting 12 Motion for Reconsideration; mooting 15 Motion to Dismiss; STRIKE the Dionnes' amended complaint (doc. no. 14) from the record, or clearly note that the only operative pleading is the Verified Petition (doc. no. 1-1). So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
April 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion to Dismiss. The Dionnes are granted leave to file an amended version of the Verified Petition within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dionne et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase
Represented By: Nathan Reed Fennessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Represented By: Nathan Reed Fennessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise C. Dionne
Represented By: David E. Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason S. Dionne
Represented By: David E. Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?