17 Outlets, LLC v. Healthy Food Corporation et al
| 17 Outlets, LLC |
| Healthy Food Corporation and Tai H. Pham |
| 1:2015cv00101 |
| March 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph A. DiClerico |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 51 Motion for Protective Order. Motion is granted to the extent that 17 Outlets is barred from pursuing discovery from HFC related to its claims against HFC and Pham and HFCs claim against Landry and ThurKen, except for discovery that seeks information about the amount of damages to be awarded on the breach of contract claim against HFC. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER denying 50 Motion for Reconsideration of 48 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla)
|
|
Filing
48
///ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Count II of the complaint is dismissed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The motion is moot as to Counts I and III and is otherwise denied. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla)
|
|
Filing
32
///ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granted as to Count I and denied as to Count II. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(gla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
