Adams v. Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.
Plaintiff: Athena Adams
Defendant: Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.
Case Number: 1:2017cv00202
Filed: May 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Office: Concord Office
Presiding Judge: Andrea K. Johnstone
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER approving 15 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(kad)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER approving 12 Report and Recommendation. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(kad)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Athena Adams
Represented By: Associated Attorneys of New England
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?