Whittaker v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Kathleen Julia Whittaker |
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner |
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only) |
1:2018cv00379 |
May 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Steven J. McAuliffe |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ///ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, and for those given in the court's earlier order, the claimant's 7 Motion to Reverse Decision of Commissioner is granted, and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Commissioner's 8 Motion to Affirm Decision of Commissioner is denied. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lw) Modified on 8/6/2019 to add: three slashes (lw). |
Filing 9 ORDER re: 7 Motion for Order Reversing Decision of Commissioner; 8 Motion for Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner. The parties shall file supplemental legal memoranda on or before April 30, 2019, explaining why the c ase should not be remanded for further proceedings before the ALJ with respect to Dr. Norians treatment notes and the medical opinions noted therein. (Supplemental Legal Memorandas due 4/30/2019.) So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (lml) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.