Valenzuela v. USA
Rafael Humberto Celaya Valenzuela |
USA |
1:2018cv00885 |
September 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Joseph N Laplante |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part #4 Motion/Request that this Honorable Court make any change required in the address, and Take Notice of the new location for Incarcerated Party pursuant to 28 U.S.C Section 2255. Text of Order: Granted in part and denied in part. The court has taken note of the defendant's new and current location. The motion seems to make no other request for cognizable relief, and is therefore denied. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Filing 4 MOTION/Request that this Honorable Court make any change required in the address, and Take Notice of the new location for Incarcerated Party pursuant to 28 U.S.C Section 2255 filed by Rafael Humberto Celaya Valenzuela. Follow up on Objection on 10/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address Rafael Humberto Celaya Valenzuela (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jb) |
Filing 2 ORDER re #1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255. USA to answer within sixty (60) days. If USA contends motion is untimely, motion to dismiss in lieu of response due within thirty (30) days. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (lml) |
NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(lml) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255 filed by Rafael Humberto Celaya Valenzuela. Notice of Filing to US Attorney with copy of the motion. See also Criminal Case No. 11-cr-84-04-JL. (Attachments: #1 Complaint In Support Of Petition, #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Affidavit of Truth, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope)(lml) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:18-cv-885-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (lml) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Valenzuela v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Rafael Humberto Celaya Valenzuela | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.