Essa v. Genzyme Corporation
| Evelyn Essa |
| Genzyme Corporation |
| 1:2019cv00222 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Steven J McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRIAL NOTICE: Pretrial Statements due 8/14/2020. LR 16.2(d) Objections due 8/28/2020. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/2/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. Jury Selection/Trial set for two week period beginning 9/15/2020 09:30 PM before Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. (lml) |
ENDORSED ORDER approving #8 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 4 days. Case Track: Standard. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CANCELLED. Text of Order: Approved and adopted as a pretrial scheduling order with the following modifications: Dispositive Motions due by 7/30/2019. Summary Judgment Motions due by 5/15/2020. Trial set for 9/15/2020. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 7/30/2019. Discovery deadline 2/28/2020. Summary Judgment Motions due by 5/15/2020. (lml)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Discovery Plan filed by Genzyme Corporation. (Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Genzyme Corporation.(Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2019 02:30 PM before Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. Follow up on Discovery Plan 4/24/2019. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(lml) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #6 Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Answer. Text of Order: Defendant's answer was filed on March 29, 2019, accordingly the motion is denied as moot. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(lml)
|
| Filing 6 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to April 2, 2019 filed by Genzyme Corporation.(Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 ///NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to Count II Only by Evelyn Essa(Meier, Christopher) Modified on 3/28/2019 to add 3 slashes (lml). |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Answer #1 Notice of Removal - New Case. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Answer Follow Up on 3/27/2019. (lml)
|
| Filing 4 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to March 27, 2019 or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Genzyme Corporation.(Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 216-2018-CV-01013, Hillsborough Northern District County Superior Court(Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Genzyme Corporation disclosing a parent company, one or more publicly traded companies, and no merger agreement. (Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Hillsborough Superior Court Northern District, case number 216-2018-CV-01013 (filing fee $400, receipt number 0102-1780561) filed by Genzyme Corporation. Answer Follow Up on 3/27/2019. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 3/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - Notice to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit C - Notice to State Court, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaczmarek, Christopher) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (ej) |
| Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-222-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ej) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Essa v. Genzyme Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Genzyme Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Kaczmarek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evelyn Essa | |
| Represented By: | Christopher T. Meier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
