Niemic v. FCI Berlin, Warden
| Scott Niemic |
| FCI Berlin, Warden |
| 1:2019cv00288 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Steven J McAuliffe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing US Marshal to Make Service. The clerk's office shall prepare and issue a summons for service on respondent, the FCI Berlin Warden, and shall provide the summons, the petition (Doc. No. 1), and this Order to the United States Marshals Service for delivery to the United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire. The clerk's office shall deliver copies of the petition (Doc. No. 1), and this Order to both the Attorney General of the United States and the FCI Berlin Warden by certified mail. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(lml)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs,Certificate of Custodial Institution.Compliance Deadline set for 5/20/2019. (bt) |
| Filing 1 Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241 and for Immediate Injunctive Relief. Filed by Scott Niemic. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bt) |
| SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to US Attorney General and FCI Berlin Warden. Service given to the US Marshals for delivery to the US Attorney for the District of New Hampshire per #3 Order Directing Service.(lml) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (bt) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(bt) |
| Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-288-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (bt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Niemic v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Scott Niemic | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
