Edwards v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
| Jennifer Ruth Edwards |
| US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner |
| US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2019cv00510 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Paul J Barbadoro |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner by Jennifer Ruth Edwards. Served/Mailed on 5/20/2019. Answer Follow Up on 7/22/2019. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Wicklund, Edward) |
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE.(vln)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Edward A. Wicklund to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # 0102-1812293.) filed by Jennifer Ruth Edwards. Follow up on Objection on 5/23/2019. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Cert of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit)(Gawryl, Janine) |
| Filing 3 Summonses issued electronically as to US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF, #2 Notice ECF SSA- Immigration Cases) (ej) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs filed by Jennifer Ruth Edwards. Follow up on Objection on 5/21/2019. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Gawryl, Janine) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/SSA COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA or IFP) filed by Jennifer Ruth Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons - Waiver SSA, #4 Summons - Waiver USAG, #5 Summons - Waiver USANH)(Gawryl, Janine) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting: #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Text of Order: Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs is hereby granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch. (ej)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-510-PB. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ej) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ej) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
