Arif v. USA
| Mustafa Hassan Arif |
| USA |
| 1:2019cv00586 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255, filed by USA. (Aframe, Seth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address Mustafa Hassan Arif.(de) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Mail Returned: No Longer Here - Return to Sender - Unable to Forward re Endo Order.(de) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Mail Returned: No Longer Here - Return to Sender - Unable to Forward re: Case Assigned, Notice of Filing to USA - 2255/2241, Notice - ECF, #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255.(de) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth R. Aframe on behalf of USA Attorney Seth R. Aframe added to party USA(pty:res).(Aframe, Seth) |
ENDORSED ORDER re: #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255. Text of Order: Having reviewed the petition, the court cannot conclude that the petition is invalid on its face. Therefore, the government shall file an answer to Arif's petition, in accordance with Rule 5(a)-(b) of the 2255 Proceeding Rules, within sixty days. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)
|
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ej) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255. Notice of Filing to US Attorney with copy of the motion. See also Criminal Case No. 1:15-cr-57-LM. filed by Mustafa Hassan Arif. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (ej) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (ej) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-586-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ej) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arif v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Mustafa Hassan Arif | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
