Riehl v. USA
| Matthew Riehl |
| USA |
| 1:2019cv00684 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph A DiClerico |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER to Transport Matthew Riehl on 9/19/2019 for Motion to Vacate Hearing - 2255 from New Jersey. ORDER Signed by Daniel J. Lynch, Clerk of Court.(ko)
|
| NOTICE re: Motion to Vacate Sentence Under 28 USC 2255. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr.(ko) |
| NOTICE: Behzad Mirhashem appointed as counsel for Matthew Riehl.(ko) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence Under 28 USC 2255. Text of Order: Hearing shall be scheduled. New counsel shall be appointed for the defendant. Defendant and prior counsel shall shall be present for hearing. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.(ko)
|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255 filed by USA. Attorney Seth R. Aframe added to party USA(pty:res). (Aframe, Seth) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, the United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire shall file an answer, a motion, or other response on or before July 25, 2019. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Answer Follow Up on 7/25/2019. (ko)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255. Notice of Filing to US Attorney with copy of the motion. See also Criminal Case No. 1:17-cr-149-JD. Filed by Matthew Riehl. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Envelope) (ej) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (ej) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ej) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-684-JD. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ej) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riehl v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Matthew Riehl | |
| Represented By: | Behzad Mirhashem (FPD) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
