Sigler v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
| Beckie Lyn Sigler |
| Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB |
| 1:2019cv00767 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Withdrawal by Enjolique D. Aytch on behalf of All Defendants(Aytch, Enjolique) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0102-1839157 filed by Beckie Lyn Sigler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Orent, Jonathan) |
| MDL 2753: Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-767-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (bt) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (bt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
