Guerrero v. USA
| Ramon Guerrero |
| USA |
| 1:2019cv00858 |
| August 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph N Laplante |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with Order dated 08/29/2019. Signed by Tracy A. Uhrin, Chief Deputy Clerk. (Case Closed) (jb) |
///ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255. Text of Order: Denied without prejudice to the filing of a proper motion in the underlying criminal case, as explained in the USAO's Response (Document #4). So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) Modified on 10/9/2019 to add /// (jb).
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255 filed by USA. (Aframe, Seth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth R. Aframe on behalf of USA Attorney Seth R. Aframe added to party USA(pty:res).(Aframe, Seth) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255. The United States Attorney to file an answer within sixty (60) days of the date of this order as outlined. In the event the United States Attorney contends that the motion is not timely filed, a motion to dismiss in lieu of a response to be filed within thirty (30) days. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ej) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255. Notice of Filing to US Attorney with copy of the motion. See also Criminal Case No. 1:12-cr-26-JL. filed by Ramon Guerrero. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ej) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (ej) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-858-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ej) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guerrero v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ramon Guerrero | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
