Hallisey v. Monsanto Company
| Ann Marie Hallisey |
| Monsanto Company |
| 1:2019cv01067 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph A DiClerico |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated. (ko) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, Complaint, ECF Notice and Civil Cover Sheet as to Monsanto Company filed by Ann Marie Hallisey. Served/Mailed on 10/24/2019. Answer Follow Up on 11/14/2019. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Noonan, D.) |
Filing 5
ORDER MDL No. 2 (FINAL ORDER) re: conditional transfer to United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Stay is lifted as no objection to the transfer was filed with the Panel. 2741 Miscellaneous Deadline set for 11/29/2019. (ko) Modified on 12/5/2019 to add: final order text(ko).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER MDL No. 1 re: conditional transfer to Northern District of California. Order is not effective until filed in the transferee court. 2741 Miscellaneous Deadline set for 11/20/2019. (ko)
|
| Filing 3 MDL - Notice of Filing, copy of the docket sheet, and a copy of the complaint sent to the MDL Panel for review. MDL Follow Up Deadline set for 12/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Public Docket Sheet) (mc) |
| Filing 2 Summons issued electronically as to Monsanto Company. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summons and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF)(mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. The case designation is: 1:19-cv-1067-JD. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0102-1875998 filed by Ann Marie Hallisey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver)(Noonan, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hallisey v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ann Marie Hallisey | |
| Represented By: | D. Michael Noonan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
