Goodyear v. Daily et al
Gregory Scott Goodyear |
Stephen McAulay, Christopher Lucas and John Daily |
1:2019fp00973 |
September 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE to the Court by Gregory Scott Goodyear. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs,Certificate of Custodial Institution, and Prisoner Consent Form. Compliance Deadline set for 11/19/2019. (bt) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (bt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Daily, Christopher Lucas, Stephen McAulay filed by Gregory Scott Goodyear. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.