Mullen v. Kissell et al
Martha Mullen |
Ms. FNU Smith, Edward J. Kissell, Jr., Teacher Witnesses, Kristin Gallo, Ms. FNU Noyes, Andrea McGahan and Hildegarde Fyfe |
1:2020cv00473 |
June 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Steven J McAuliffe |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE re #17 MOTION for Contempt filed by Martha Mullen. Although the clerk's office has no obligation to review pleadings for personal identifiers, please note that attachment to the above-referenced document contains personal identifiers in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1. The filing party may remedy this violation by filing a redacted document in its entirety and add to the title of the filing, Replacement for doc. no. 17, and file a motion to seal the attachments to the previously filed unredacted document. If no action is taken, the unredacted document will remain publicly available.(lw) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Contempt filed by Martha Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(lw) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Accept Additional Attachments filed by Martha Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(lw) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Accept Additional Information filed by Martha Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(lw) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Martha Mullen.(lw) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Accept All Attachments filed by Martha Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Waiver)(lw) |
|
|
|
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS/WAIVER by Martha Mullen.(lw) |
|
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension filed by Martha Mullen.(lw) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Correct filed by Martha Mullen. Follow up on Objection on 7/23/2020. (lw) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION in Limine: Disqualification of Steven McAuliffe filed by Martha Mullen.(ko) |
|
|
Filing 4 Supplemental Complaint/MOTION for Additional Information for Court Justice filed by Martha Mullen.(mc) Modified on 6/30/2020: The court construes the motion as a supplemental complaint per #5 Order dated June 29, 2020 (ko). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs filed by Martha Mullen.(mc) |
Application complete - case converted to a civil case. Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. New case number is 1:20-cv-473-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Compliance Deadline set for 6/22/2020.(mc) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kristin Gallo, Edward J. Kissell, Jr, Andrea McGahan, FNU Noyes, FNU Smith, Teacher Witnesses filed by Martha Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents-part 1, #2 Supporting Documents-part 2)(mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.