Jenkins v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner: Daniel Jenkins
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden
Case Number: 1:2020cv00803
Filed: August 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Paul J Barbadoro
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT re: #4 Order Directing Service, Clerk Service. (js)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RETURN re: #4 Order Directing Service, Clerk Service. (js)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to FCI Berlin, Warden per #4 Order Directing Service.(js)
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(js)
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing Fee paid - case converted to a civil case: $ 5 (Check), receipt number 14649019663 Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. New case number is 1:20-cv-803-PB. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc)
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Letter to Clerk of Court from Daniel Jenkins re: Filing Fee. (mc)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution. Compliance Deadline set for 9/29/2020. (mc)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. filed by Daniel Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Attachment 1 & 2, #3 Exhibits A, B, & C, #4 Memorandum of Law in Support, #5 Envelope)(mc)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (mc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?