Kinetic System, Inc. v. IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Kinetic System, Inc.
Defendant: IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC and Lonza Biologics, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv01125
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Steven J McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set for 2/16/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. Follow up on Discovery Plan 2/10/2021. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(lw)
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC, Lonza Biologics, Inc..Follow up on Objection on 1/22/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit (Affidavit) Declaration of Anthony Malvone, #3 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit A to Malvone Declaration - Dec. 2018 Contract, #4 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit B to Malvone Declaration - Apr. 2019 Contract)(Callaghan, Peter)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Disclosure Statement by Kinetic System, Inc. disclosing a parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Sherman, John)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Joint Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Answer Follow Up on 1/8/2021. (lw)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Joint Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to January 8, 2021 filed by IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC, Lonza Biologics, Inc..(Callaghan, Peter)
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Joint Motion to Extend Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Answer Follow Up on 12/18/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(lw)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 218-2020-CV-01083, Rockingham County Superior Court(Callaghan, Peter)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE re: #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC. LR 7.1.1. In removal actions, a nongovernmental corporate plaintiff, partnership plaintiff, or LLC plaintiff must file a disclosure statement within twenty-one (21) days from the date the notice of removal is filed or with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, objection, or request, whichever is filed sooner. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. Kinetic System, Inc. shall file a disclosure statement by December 21, 2020. Disclosure Statement due 12/21/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (ed)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (ed)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to December 18, 2020 filed by IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC, Lonza Biologics, Inc..Follow up on Objection on 12/9/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Contract Excerpts, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Case Summary)(Callaghan, Peter)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by Lonza Biologics, Inc. disclosing a parent company, one or more publicly traded companies, and no merger agreement. (Hilson, Christopher)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher T. Hilson on behalf of Lonza Biologics, Inc. Attorney Christopher T. Hilson added to party Lonza Biologics, Inc.(pty:dft).(Hilson, Christopher)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:20-cv-1125-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC disclosing a parent company, one or more publicly traded companies, and no merger agreement. (Callaghan, Peter)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Rockingham County Superior Court, case number 218-2020-CV-01083 (No fee paid, USA or IFP.) filed by IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC. Answer Follow Up on 12/11/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 12/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Documents served on Defendant IPS, #3 Exhibit Notice of Removal to Clerk of Rockingham County Superior Court, #4 Exhibit Notice of Removal to Counsel)(Callaghan, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kinetic System, Inc. v. IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC
Represented By: Peter G. Callaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lonza Biologics, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher T. Hilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kinetic System, Inc.
Represented By: John P. Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?