Curtis v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Christopher David Curtis |
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner |
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only) |
1:2020cv01140 |
November 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Joseph N Laplante |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to US Social Security Administration, Commissioner by Christopher David Curtis. Served/Mailed on 12/21/2020. Answer Follow Up on 2/22/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt, #2 Certified Mail Receipt, #3 certified mail receipt)(Jones, Daniel) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel S. Jones on behalf of Christopher David Curtis Attorney Daniel S. Jones added to party Christopher David Curtis(pty:pla).(Jones, Daniel) |
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Motion for Daniel S. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.The clerks office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(jb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Daniel S. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2055324.) filed by Christopher David Curtis.Follow up on Objection on 12/16/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Affidavit) Aff of Atty Jones, #2 Exhibit Cert of Good Standing for Atty Jones, #3 Proposed Order Proposed order for pro hac vice motion)(Cabrera, Sandra) |
Filing 2 Summonses issued electronically as to US Social Security Administration, Commissioner. ATTENTION: Pursuant to Local Rule 9.1(a)(1), the government agrees not to contest the adequacy of service when the summonses and complaint are transmitted through the court's Electronic Filing System. SSA Record Due 2/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF, #2 SSA Notice) (ed) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:20-cv-1140-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANHDC-2053029 filed by Christopher David Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver, #3 Summons - Waiver, #4 Summons - Waiver)(Cabrera, Sandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.