Curtis v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Christopher David Curtis
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court: US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2020cv01140
Filed: November 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Joseph N Laplante
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2021 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to US Social Security Administration, Commissioner by Christopher David Curtis. Served/Mailed on 12/21/2020. Answer Follow Up on 2/22/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt, #2 Certified Mail Receipt, #3 certified mail receipt)(Jones, Daniel)
December 10, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel S. Jones on behalf of Christopher David Curtis Attorney Daniel S. Jones added to party Christopher David Curtis(pty:pla).(Jones, Daniel)
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Motion for Daniel S. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.The clerks office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(jb)
December 2, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Daniel S. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2055324.) filed by Christopher David Curtis.Follow up on Objection on 12/16/2020. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Affidavit) Aff of Atty Jones, #2 Exhibit Cert of Good Standing for Atty Jones, #3 Proposed Order Proposed order for pro hac vice motion)(Cabrera, Sandra)
December 1, 2020 Filing 2 Summonses issued electronically as to US Social Security Administration, Commissioner. ATTENTION: Pursuant to Local Rule 9.1(a)(1), the government agrees not to contest the adequacy of service when the summonses and complaint are transmitted through the court's Electronic Filing System. SSA Record Due 2/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF, #2 SSA Notice) (ed)
December 1, 2020 NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed)
November 24, 2020 Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:20-cv-1140-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed)
November 24, 2020 Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANHDC-2053029 filed by Christopher David Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver, #3 Summons - Waiver, #4 Summons - Waiver)(Cabrera, Sandra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curtis v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher David Curtis
Represented By: Sandra L. Cabrera
Represented By: Daniel S. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?