Cormier v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc. et al
Michael Cormier |
Securitas Security Services USA Inc. and Cadient, LLC |
1:2021cv00123 |
February 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Joseph N Laplante |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher A. Kenney on behalf of Securitas Security Services USA Inc. Attorney Christopher A. Kenney added to party Securitas Security Services USA Inc.(pty:dft).(Kenney, Christopher) |
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Motion for Christopher A. Kenney to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.The clerks office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(jb) |
Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Christopher A. Kenney to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2088096.) filed by Securitas Security Services USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Affidavit) Affidavit of Christopher A. Kenney)(Mordecai, Adam) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam R. Mordecai on behalf of Securitas Security Services USA Inc. Attorney Adam R. Mordecai added to party Securitas Security Services USA Inc.(pty:dft).(Mordecai, Adam) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Cadient, LLC by Michael Cormier. Served/Mailed on 2/5/2021. Answer Follow Up on 4/9/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Green, Jared) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Securitas Security Services USA Inc. by Michael Cormier. Served/Mailed on 2/5/2021. Answer Follow Up on 4/9/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Green, Jared) |
Filing 2 Notice of Lawsuit/Waiver issued electronically as to Cadient, LLC, Securitas Security Services USA Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the notice/waiver and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF) (ed) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-123-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANHDC-2077817 filed by Michael Cormier.(Green, Jared) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/4/2021: #1 Revised Complaint with Minor's Initials, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notices of Lawsuit - Waivers) (ed). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.