Simuel v. FCI Berlin, Warden
| Marion Simuel |
| FCI Berlin, Warden |
| 1:2021cv00127 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Paul J Barbadoro |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re Consolidation with 21-cv-128-LM. Unless any party files an objection to consolidation within 60 days of the date of this order, these cases will be consolidated and an order of consolidation will be issued. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(vln)
|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to FCI Berlin, Warden by Marion Simuel. (vln) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth R. Aframe on behalf of FCI Berlin, Warden Attorney Seth R. Aframe added to party FCI Berlin, Warden(pty:res).(Aframe, Seth) |
| SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to FCI Berlin, Warden per #3 Order Directing Service.(vln) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service; granting in part #1 Motionto Order the Southeast Region Office and Central Administrative Office to Produce Records. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(vln)
|
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
| Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 2.5.2021) filed by Marion Simuel. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Attachments, #3 Letter Regarding Filing Fee, #4 Envelope) (ed) |
| Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-127-PB. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (ed) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Order the Southeast Region Office and Central Administrative Office to Produce Records filed by Marion Simuel. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simuel v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marion Simuel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
