Garda v. Kohl's, Inc.
| Gail Garda and Gail P. Garda |
| Kohl's, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00215 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. IN CHAMBERS CONFERENCE via video conference held on 5/6/2021. (Court Reporter: Liza Dubois) (Pltfs Atty: Shawn Crapo) (Defts Atty: Linda Smith)(Total Hearing Time: 4 Minutes) (bt) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes including trial. (Smith, Linda) |
| NOTICE of Hearing. In Chambers Conference via video set for 5/6/2021 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. (bt) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Kohl's, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit New Hampshire Secretary of State online corporate registration records)(Smith, Linda) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand filed by Kohl's, Inc..(Smith, Linda) |
Filing 6
ORDER. The defendant shall have fourteen (14) days to file a memorandum with any supporting materials demonstrating that this court has subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff shall have seven (7) days to respond to the defendants memorandum. To the extent the parties find that jurisdictional discovery is necessary, they may move for such discovery. If the defendant fails to file this memorandum, the court will determine the existence of subject matter jurisdiction on the parties current filings. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(kad)
|
| NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference via Video set for 5/25/2021 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Follow up on Discovery Plan 5/18/2021. If no consent form has been filed, a consent form is due on or before the deadline for filing the discovery plan.(kad) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER re: #3 Motion to Remove From State Court. Text of Order: While the defendant fashioned its removal request (3) as a motion, it appears to be a notice of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(a) and the court will accept it as such. Pursuant to LR 81.1, the defendant shall file its answer within 14 days of this order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(kad)
|
| Filing 5 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 218-2021-cv-00003, Rockingham County Superior Court(Smith, Linda) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by Kohl's, Inc. disclosing a parent company, one or more publicly traded companies, and no merger agreement. (Smith, Linda) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remove From State Court (Replaces Attachment 1 to Doc. No. 1) filed by Kohl's, Inc..Follow up on Objection on 3/29/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Smith, Linda) Modified on 3/16/2021 to add text: "to Remove From State Court" (kad). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge and Consent Form sent to all parties.(mc) |
| Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-215-AJ. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (mc) |
| NOTICE of ECF Filing Error - Action Required - re: #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Kohl's, Inc. Filer used wrong event. Filer shall refile using the Motion/Miscellaneous Relief event and enter in docket text: Replaces document no. Replaces Attachment 1 to Doc. No. 1. If the filing party has any questions concerning this notice, please contact the judge's case manager at 603-225-1423. (mc) |
| NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Kohl's, Inc. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, Disclosure Statements must be filed after filing case initiating document. No Disclosure Statement has been filed. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. Kohl's, Inc. shall file a disclosure statement by March 19, 2021. Disclosure Statement due 3/19/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (mc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Rockingham, case number 218-2021-cv-00003 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2090210) filed by Kohl's, Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 3/31/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 3/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Notice to State Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Linda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
