Bornstein v. University System of New Hampshire
| Steven Bornstein |
| University System of New Hampshire |
| 1:2021cv00266 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRIAL NOTICE: Jury Selection/Trial set for two week period beginning 11/8/2022 09:30 AM before Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/27/2022 03:00 PM before Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Pretrial Statements due 10/10/2022. JERS Statement due 10/10/2022. LR 16.2(d) Objections due 10/24/2022.(js) |
ENDORSED ORDER approving #7 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 4-5 days. Case Track: Standard. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CANCELLED. Text of Order: Approved and adopted as a pretrial scheduling order. Trial: Two-week trial period beginning November 8, 2022. In light of the court's approval of the joint discovery plan, the pretrial conference currently scheduled for June 14, 2021 is unnecessary and is cancelled. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Summary Judgment Motions due by 7/1/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 8/16/2021. Mediation Follow Up on 1/15/2022.(js)
|
| Filing 7 Proposed Discovery Plan Joint Proposed Discovery Plan Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) filed by University System of New Hampshire. (Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand ANSWER AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by University System of New Hampshire.(Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kimberly M.R. Sullivan on behalf of University System of New Hampshire Attorney Kimberly M.R. Sullivan added to party University System of New Hampshire(pty:dft).(Sullivan, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE for 6/14/2021 03:30 PM before Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Follow up on Discovery Plan 6/7/2021. (js) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 217-2021-cv-132, Merrimack County Superior Court(Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 3 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to May 11, 2021 Defendant's Assented-To Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint from April 8, 2021 to May 11, 2021 filed by University System of New Hampshire.(Van Oot, Martha) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Answer. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Answer Follow Up on 5/11/2021. (de)
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by University System of New Hampshire disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Merrimack County Superior Court, case number 217-2021-cv-00132 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2098241) filed by University System of New Hampshire. Answer Follow Up on 4/22/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 4/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Summons, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal to Plaintiff's Counsel, #4 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal to State Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Van Oot, Martha) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (ed) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-266-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bornstein v. University System of New Hampshire | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University System of New Hampshire | |
| Represented By: | Martha Van Oot |
| Represented By: | Kimberly M.R. Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Bornstein | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin T. King |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
