Rioux v. US Postal Service et al
| Lee Ann Rioux |
| Jon Doe, United States of America, Sally Roe, Orr & Reno, PLLC and US Postal Service |
| 1:2021cv00275 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Joseph N Laplante |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Text of Order: Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs is hereby granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch. (mc)
|
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Filing 6 PROCEDURAL ORDER IN TRANSFERRED CASE. ORDER Signed by Daniel J. Lynch, Clerk of Court. Compliance Deadline set for 5/5/2021. (mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-275-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number: 1:21-cv-02242. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order to Lee Ann Rioux at P.O. Box 112, Madison, NH 03849. (kh) [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.] |
| Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of New Hampshire. (sac) [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.] |
|
Filing 3
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this action. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/26/2021) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.]
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu) [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.] |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Jon Doe, Orr & Reno, PLLC, Sally Roe, United States of America. Document filed by Lee Ann Rioux..(rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.] |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Lee Ann Rioux..(rdz) Modified on 3/16/2021 (rdz). [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 4/5/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
